Prevalence of frequent condom usage plus the outcomes of univariate and multivariate mixed-effect logistic regressions are shown in dining dining table 1 ) Age wasn’t a factor that is significant. On the basis of the mixed-effects model that is multivariate regular condom usage ended up being not as likely among YMSM who have been recruited online versus in-person, reported a Pacific versus European anal live sex ethnicity, had no tertiary training versus at the very least some, were HIV good versus HIV negative, or reported also making love with females versus only guys. In contrast to guys who reported one partner that is sexual the last a few months, frequent condom usage had been much more likely for guys reporting 2вЂ“5 partners, likewise most most likely for males reporting 6вЂ“20 partners, but more unlikely for men reporting higher than 20 lovers. Regular condom usage ended up being much more likely with casual lovers than with fuckbuddies, which often had been much more likely than with boyfriends. Regular condom usage ended up being much more likely among YMSM with faster regular partner relationships, whom were receptive versus versatile using their regular partner, or who had been insertive only versus versatile across all partner kinds.
Of all of the 2412 individuals whom reported present intercourse that is anal a total of 221 males (9.2%) reported on three of four feasible situations and 392 males (16.3%) reported on all four feasible situations. For those second 392 YMSM, the prevalence of individualsвЂ™ condom use degree combinations are presented in dining table 3 to illustrate habitual condom usage habits for YMSM participating in both intimate jobs with both partner kinds. Of the, 74.5% reported either habitual regular use (n=181, 46.2%) or habitual infrequent usage (n=111, 28.3%).